Let me make the case that the opposite is true: Service Projects benefit even more from the core practices of IBM Design Thinking.
Hills
Service projects want to deliver business value to the user in a short time.
Credit IBM |
Three questions drive this focus:
Who is the User?
What is the Problem?
What is a sufficient Solution?
Look at this example from an actual project: "“Support recovery from a disaster with an RTO of less than 6 hours and near zero RPO”. Clearly, this will be very common hills for a service project.
Sponsor Users
Credit IBM |
Playbacks
Service Projects need commitment, both from the client side, as well as from the service teams.
IBM Design Thinking is a commitment to a new way of working, to be more adaptable.
Playbacks puts client commitment center stages as it reduces the noise of nonspecific conversations, and improves the quality and consistency of feedback.
For the team creating the service, Playbacks will check progress against the original goals, and thereby emphasize the commitment to the business and customer value defined in the Hills.
Credit IBM |
For the team creating the service, Playbacks will check progress against the original goals, and thereby emphasize the commitment to the business and customer value defined in the Hills.
I would like to hear from you: have you used Design Thinking in Service Projects?
No comments:
Post a Comment